__timestamp | Ferguson plc | Snap-on Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1450623023 | 767600000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1500920522 | 848900000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1289082542 | 942400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1746753588 | 971900000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1487000000 | 1057400000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1707000000 | 1067000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1979000000 | 991400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2248000000 | 1249100000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3120000000 | 1351500000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3097000000 | 1478800000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2978000000 | 1520700000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding a company's financial health is paramount. EBITDA, or Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization, serves as a crucial indicator of operational performance. This analysis delves into the EBITDA trends of Ferguson plc and Snap-on Incorporated from 2014 to 2023.
Ferguson plc has demonstrated a robust growth trajectory, with its EBITDA surging by over 100% from 2014 to 2023. Notably, 2022 marked a peak, with EBITDA reaching approximately 3.12 billion, a testament to its strategic initiatives and market adaptability.
Snap-on Incorporated, while exhibiting a more modest growth, saw its EBITDA increase by nearly 93% over the same period. The year 2023 was particularly significant, with EBITDA hitting a high of 1.48 billion.
Despite missing data for 2024, these trends underscore the resilience and strategic prowess of both companies in navigating economic challenges.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Ferguson plc and Snap-on Incorporated's Expenses
EBITDA Performance Review: Ferguson plc vs TransUnion
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Ferguson plc Against Carlisle Companies Incorporated
EBITDA Performance Review: Ferguson plc vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Ferguson plc Against Masco Corporation
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Ferguson plc and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
EBITDA Performance Review: Ferguson plc vs Pentair plc