A Professional Review of EBITDA: Lam Research Corporation Compared to Seagate Technology Holdings plc

Lam vs. Seagate: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampLam Research CorporationSeagate Technology Holdings plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20149779230002665000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511552240002312000000
Friday, January 1, 201613652840001488000000
Sunday, January 1, 201722188370001981000000
Monday, January 1, 201835396940002328000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201927740130002006000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202029423270001761000000
Friday, January 1, 202147891740001897000000
Saturday, January 1, 202257155610002409000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235637608000301000000
Monday, January 1, 202449051570001030000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of EBITDA: Lam Research vs. Seagate Technology

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, financial performance is a key indicator of a company's resilience and growth. Over the past decade, Lam Research Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc have showcased contrasting trajectories in their EBITDA, a crucial measure of profitability.

Lam Research Corporation: A Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2024, Lam Research has demonstrated a robust growth in EBITDA, with a remarkable increase of over 500%. This upward trend highlights the company's strategic prowess in the semiconductor industry, especially during the boom years of 2021 and 2022.

Seagate Technology: A Volatile Journey

Conversely, Seagate Technology's EBITDA has experienced fluctuations, peaking in 2014 and 2018, but showing a significant decline by 2023. This volatility reflects the challenges faced in the data storage sector, emphasizing the need for innovation and adaptation.

In summary, while Lam Research has capitalized on industry trends, Seagate Technology's journey underscores the dynamic nature of tech markets.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025