A Professional Review of EBITDA: United Parcel Service, Inc. Compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

UPS vs. Stanley Black & Decker: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.United Parcel Service, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201419754000009055000000
Thursday, January 1, 201517419000009870000000
Friday, January 1, 201618102000009740000000
Sunday, January 1, 201721960000009611000000
Monday, January 1, 201817912000009292000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019192060000010194000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020200420000010366000000
Friday, January 1, 2021234550000015821000000
Saturday, January 1, 202294280000017005000000
Sunday, January 1, 202380270000012714000000
Monday, January 1, 202428630000010185000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of EBITDA: UPS vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of global commerce, understanding the financial health of industry giants is crucial. This analysis delves into the EBITDA performance of United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023.

UPS: A Steady Climb

UPS has demonstrated a robust growth trajectory, with its EBITDA increasing by approximately 40% from 2014 to 2023. The most significant leap occurred in 2021, with a 52% rise compared to the previous year, reflecting the surge in e-commerce and logistics demand during the pandemic.

Stanley Black & Decker: A Mixed Bag

Conversely, Stanley Black & Decker's EBITDA has seen fluctuations, peaking in 2017 and then experiencing a decline. By 2023, their EBITDA had decreased by nearly 60% from its 2017 high, indicating potential challenges in the manufacturing sector.

This comparative analysis highlights the resilience of UPS in adapting to market demands, while Stanley Black & Decker faces hurdles in maintaining its financial momentum.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025