__timestamp | Deere & Company | TransUnion |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 6912900000 | 429400000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5196500000 | 478200000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 4697500000 | 585300000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 5295800000 | 701100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 6613400000 | 819800000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8135000000 | 993200000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 7721000000 | 883400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 10410000000 | 1010500000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 11030000000 | 1173800000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 17036000000 | 667300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14672000000 | 1204100000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial indicator of a company's operational performance. This analysis juxtaposes the EBITDA of two industry giants: Deere & Company and TransUnion, from 2014 to 2023. Deere & Company, a stalwart in the agricultural machinery sector, has shown a robust growth trajectory, with its EBITDA surging by approximately 146% over the decade. In contrast, TransUnion, a leader in credit reporting, experienced a more modest growth of around 173% until 2022, before a notable dip in 2023.
The data reveals that Deere & Company consistently outperformed TransUnion, with its EBITDA peaking at 17 billion in 2023. Meanwhile, TransUnion's EBITDA reached its zenith in 2022, before declining sharply. This divergence underscores the varying market dynamics and strategic decisions impacting these two companies. Notably, the absence of data for TransUnion in 2024 suggests potential challenges or strategic shifts.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Deere & Company and TransUnion's Expenses
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Deere & Company vs Dover Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Deere & Company or TransUnion
Deere & Company vs AerCap Holdings N.V.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison
EBITDA Performance Review: Deere & Company vs Masco Corporation