__timestamp | Deere & Company | U-Haul Holding Company |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 6912900000 | 923383000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5196500000 | 1076520000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 4697500000 | 1255474000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 5295800000 | 1195593000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 6613400000 | 1123974000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8135000000 | 1200955000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 7721000000 | 1202436000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 10410000000 | 1627442000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 11030000000 | 2337788000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 17036000000 | 2183839000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14672000000 | 1919656000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of American industry, the financial performance of companies like Deere & Company and U-Haul Holding Company offers a fascinating glimpse into their resilience and adaptability. Over the past decade, Deere & Company has demonstrated a robust growth trajectory, with its EBITDA increasing by approximately 146% from 2014 to 2023. This growth underscores its strategic prowess in the agricultural and construction sectors. In contrast, U-Haul Holding Company, a stalwart in the moving and storage industry, has seen a more modest EBITDA growth of around 137% during the same period. Notably, 2022 marked a peak year for both companies, with Deere & Company achieving its highest EBITDA, while U-Haul Holding Company also reached a significant milestone. This side-by-side analysis highlights the diverse strategies and market conditions that shape the financial landscapes of these iconic American companies.
Deere & Company and U-Haul Holding Company: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Deere & Company or U-Haul Holding Company
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Deere & Company vs AECOM
EBITDA Performance Review: Deere & Company vs Pool Corporation
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Deere & Company Compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Deere & Company vs Nordson Corporation: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison