Accenture plc or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Accenture vs. Broadridge: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAccenture plcBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20145401969000376000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155373370000396800000
Friday, January 1, 20165466982000420900000
Sunday, January 1, 20176397883000501400000
Monday, January 1, 20186601872000565400000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197009614000577500000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207462514000639000000
Friday, January 1, 20218742599000744300000
Saturday, January 1, 202210334358000832300000
Sunday, January 1, 202310858572000849000000
Monday, January 1, 202411128030000916800000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Managing SG&A Costs: Accenture vs. Broadridge

In the competitive world of financial management, controlling Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2024, Accenture plc and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in managing these costs. Accenture's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 106%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. In contrast, Broadridge has maintained a more conservative increase of around 144%, indicating a steady yet controlled expansion.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Accenture's SG&A expenses grew from $5.4 billion in 2014 to $11.1 billion in 2024, showcasing its aggressive market positioning. Meanwhile, Broadridge's expenses rose from $376 million to $916 million, highlighting its focus on sustainable growth. This comparison offers a fascinating insight into how two industry giants navigate financial management, with Accenture prioritizing rapid expansion and Broadridge emphasizing stability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025