ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Perrigo Company plc: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Divergent SG&A trends in pharma giants: ADMA vs. Perrigo

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Perrigo Company plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20144823869675200000
Thursday, January 1, 20156745968771800000
Friday, January 1, 201684947421205500000
Sunday, January 1, 2017180928351146500000
Monday, January 1, 2018225029221125800000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019259107571166100000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020350508171175500000
Friday, January 1, 2021428968891111400000
Saturday, January 1, 2022524580241210100000
Sunday, January 1, 2023590200001274600000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial strategies of key players is crucial. ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Perrigo Company plc, two prominent names, exhibit contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2023, ADMA Biologics saw a staggering increase of over 1,100% in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Perrigo Company maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest 89% rise, indicating a focus on steady expansion and operational efficiency.

This divergence highlights the different paths companies can take in the competitive pharmaceutical sector. While ADMA's rapid increase suggests a focus on scaling operations, Perrigo's consistent spending underscores its commitment to sustainable growth. These insights provide a window into the strategic priorities shaping the future of these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025