ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending

R&D Spending: ADMA vs. Taro's Strategic Approaches

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014951701455430000
Thursday, January 1, 2015701594665510000
Friday, January 1, 2016768823871160000
Sunday, January 1, 2017622958770644000
Monday, January 1, 2018392612070418000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019234384863238000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020590701359777000
Friday, January 1, 2021364606060152000
Saturday, January 1, 2022361376454540000
Sunday, January 1, 2023330000052243000
Monday, January 1, 202464536000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Strategic R&D Investments: ADMA Biologics vs. Taro Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, strategic investment in research and development (R&D) is crucial for innovation and growth. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to R&D spending. From 2014 to 2023, Taro consistently allocated a significant portion of its resources to R&D, peaking in 2016 with a 71 million USD investment. This commitment underscores Taro's focus on maintaining a robust pipeline of pharmaceutical innovations.

Conversely, ADMA Biologics exhibited a more fluctuating R&D expenditure pattern, with a notable high in 2014, investing approximately 9.5 million USD, followed by a gradual decline. By 2023, ADMA's R&D spending had decreased by over 65%, reflecting a strategic shift or potential resource constraints. This divergence in R&D strategies highlights the varied paths companies take in the pursuit of pharmaceutical advancements.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025