Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Palo Alto Networks, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

AMD vs. Palo Alto: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014599000000407912000
Thursday, January 1, 2015482000000624261000
Friday, January 1, 2016466000000914400000
Sunday, January 1, 20175160000001117400000
Monday, January 1, 20185620000001356200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197500000001605800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209950000001819800000
Friday, January 1, 202114480000002144900000
Saturday, January 1, 202223360000002553900000
Sunday, January 1, 202323520000002991700000
Monday, January 1, 202427830000003475000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Cost Management: AMD vs. Palo Alto Networks

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, AMD's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 293%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks saw a 633% increase, indicating a robust investment in sales and administrative capabilities to support its cybersecurity dominance.

Interestingly, while AMD's expenses peaked in 2023, Palo Alto Networks continued its upward trajectory into 2024, albeit with missing data for AMD. This suggests a potential shift in focus or strategy for AMD. As these companies evolve, their ability to manage SG&A costs will remain a key indicator of their operational efficiency and market adaptability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025