Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

AMD vs. Teradyne: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Teradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014599000000319713000
Thursday, January 1, 2015482000000306313000
Friday, January 1, 2016466000000315682000
Sunday, January 1, 2017516000000348287000
Monday, January 1, 2018562000000390669000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019750000000437083000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020995000000464769000
Friday, January 1, 20211448000000547559000
Saturday, January 1, 20222336000000558103000
Sunday, January 1, 20232352000000571426000
Monday, January 1, 202427830000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: AMD or Teradyne?

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Teradyne, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, AMD's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 300%, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategy. In contrast, Teradyne's expenses increased by approximately 80%, indicating a more conservative approach.

AMD's expenses peaked in 2023, reaching over four times that of Teradyne's, highlighting its significant investment in marketing and administrative capabilities. Meanwhile, Teradyne's steady increase suggests a focus on efficiency and cost control. This divergence in strategy underscores the different paths these companies have taken in the tech industry, with AMD prioritizing rapid growth and Teradyne emphasizing sustainable management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025