Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Garmin Ltd.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

AMD vs. Garmin: A Decade of Cost Efficiency Compared

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Garmin Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 201436670000001266246000
Thursday, January 1, 201529110000001281566000
Friday, January 1, 201633160000001339095000
Sunday, January 1, 201734660000001303840000
Monday, January 1, 201840280000001367725000
Tuesday, January 1, 201938630000001523529000
Wednesday, January 1, 202054160000001705237000
Friday, January 1, 202185050000002092336000
Saturday, January 1, 2022115500000002053511000
Sunday, January 1, 2023122200000002223297000
Monday, January 1, 2024130600000002600348000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Exploring Cost Efficiency: AMD vs. Garmin

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Garmin Ltd. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, AMD's cost of revenue surged by approximately 233%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and increased production costs. In contrast, Garmin's cost of revenue rose by about 76%, indicating a more stable and controlled cost structure.

Key Insights

  • AMD's Growth: AMD's cost of revenue peaked in 2023, highlighting its expansion in the semiconductor market.
  • Garmin's Stability: Garmin maintained a steady increase, showcasing its efficiency in managing production costs.

This comparison underscores the distinct strategies of these tech giants, with AMD focusing on rapid growth and Garmin emphasizing cost control. Such insights are invaluable for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025