Analyzing Cost of Revenue: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Cost of Revenue Trends in Biopharmaceuticals: ACADIA vs. BioCryst

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201460602000122000
Thursday, January 1, 2015763690001896000
Friday, January 1, 201644060002699000
Sunday, January 1, 2017130600001702000
Monday, January 1, 201818330000471000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019195980004101000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020205500001676000
Friday, January 1, 2021191410007264000
Saturday, January 1, 2022101660006594000
Sunday, January 1, 2023457310004661000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biopharmaceutical Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. Over the past decade, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA's cost of revenue fluctuated significantly, peaking in 2015 with a 76% increase from the previous year, before experiencing a notable decline in 2016. In contrast, BioCryst's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of around 5% annually, except for a sharp rise in 2021. This divergence highlights the different strategic approaches these companies have taken in managing their production costs. As the biopharmaceutical industry continues to grow, monitoring these financial metrics will be essential for investors and stakeholders alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025