Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Apple Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.

Apple vs. Pure Storage: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampApple Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411225800000024129000
Thursday, January 1, 201514008900000077552000
Friday, January 1, 2016131376000000167893000
Sunday, January 1, 2017141048000000252279000
Monday, January 1, 2018163756000000353781000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019161782000000457528000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020169559000000509886000
Friday, January 1, 2021212981000000535255000
Saturday, January 1, 2022223546000000708329000
Sunday, January 1, 2023214137000000855788000
Monday, January 1, 2024210352000000809430000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Apple Inc. vs. Pure Storage, Inc.

In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have shown contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2024, Apple Inc. has seen a steady increase, peaking in 2022 with a 99% rise from 2014. This reflects Apple's robust growth and market dominance. In contrast, Pure Storage, Inc. started with a modest cost of revenue, but by 2023, it had surged by over 3,400%, highlighting its aggressive expansion strategy. While Apple's cost of revenue is significantly higher, Pure Storage's rapid growth rate is noteworthy. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies of tech giants in managing production costs and scaling operations.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025