Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Nutanix, Inc.

Comparing Cost of Revenue Growth: Applied Materials vs. Nutanix

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Nutanix, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014522900000060912000
Thursday, January 1, 20155707000000100959000
Friday, January 1, 20166314000000170787000
Sunday, January 1, 20178005000000327331000
Monday, January 1, 20189436000000386030000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198222000000304128000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209510000000286689000
Friday, January 1, 202112149000000291906000
Saturday, January 1, 202213792000000321156000
Sunday, January 1, 202314133000000332187000
Monday, January 1, 202414279000000324112000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. Applied Materials, Inc. and Nutanix, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Applied Materials has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 173%, from $5.2 billion in 2014 to an estimated $14.3 billion in 2024. This reflects its expanding footprint in the semiconductor industry. Meanwhile, Nutanix, a leader in cloud computing, has experienced a more modest increase of around 432%, from $60 million to $324 million over the same period. This disparity highlights the different scales and growth trajectories of these companies. While Applied Materials' cost of revenue is significantly higher, Nutanix's rapid percentage growth underscores its dynamic presence in the tech sector. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the strategic directions of these industry giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025