Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc

Cost of Revenue: Booz Allen vs. Rentokil

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationRentokil Initial plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20142716113000297500000
Thursday, January 1, 20152593849000310200000
Friday, January 1, 20162580026000376100000
Sunday, January 1, 20172691982000474900000
Monday, January 1, 20182867103000514200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201931004660002099000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202033791800002136400000
Friday, January 1, 202136575300002239100000
Saturday, January 1, 202238996220002737000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234304810000927000000
Monday, January 1, 20248202847000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

A Comparative Insight into Booz Allen Hamilton and Rentokil Initial

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc, two giants in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Booz Allen Hamilton's cost of revenue surged by approximately 58%, reflecting its expanding operations and market reach. In contrast, Rentokil Initial experienced a more modest increase of around 820% until 2022, before a notable dip in 2023. This fluctuation highlights the dynamic nature of the pest control industry. Interestingly, data for 2024 is incomplete, suggesting potential shifts in market strategies. As businesses navigate the complexities of cost management, these insights underscore the importance of strategic planning and adaptability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025