__timestamp | Merck & Co., Inc. | Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 16768000000 | 520990000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14934000000 | 535405000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 13891000000 | 558755000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 12775000000 | 495921000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 13509000000 | 659690000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 14112000000 | 1089764000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 13618000000 | 994308000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 13626000000 | 1106846000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 17411000000 | 1244072000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 16126000000 | 1431505000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1431505000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. This analysis focuses on two industry titans: Merck & Co., Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, from 2014 to 2023.
Merck's cost of revenue has shown a relatively stable trend over the years, with a slight increase of approximately 27% from 2014 to 2023. The peak was observed in 2022, with a notable 27% rise compared to the previous year, indicating strategic investments or increased production costs.
Takeda, on the other hand, experienced a dramatic surge in its cost of revenue, skyrocketing by over 175% from 2014 to 2023. This significant increase, particularly between 2018 and 2023, reflects Takeda's aggressive expansion and acquisition strategies.
The data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of the industry and the need for continuous monitoring.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Merck & Co., Inc. vs BeiGene, Ltd.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Merck & Co., Inc. and Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's Expenses
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Merck & Co., Inc. and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Merck & Co., Inc. and PTC Therapeutics, Inc.'s Expenses
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Merck & Co., Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Merck & Co., Inc. and Mesoblast Limited
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Merck & Co., Inc. and Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Pfizer Inc. vs Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited vs Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Cost of Revenue Trends: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited vs Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited vs Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored