Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants' Revenue Costs: A Decade of Growth and Strategy

__timestampNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141440000094103000
Thursday, January 1, 201533800000146194000
Friday, January 1, 201635900000130000
Sunday, January 1, 201712540007353000
Monday, January 1, 2018488900034193000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019740000056586000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201010000063382000
Friday, January 1, 20211430000097049000
Saturday, January 1, 202223200000139989000
Sunday, January 1, 202339700000150343000
Monday, January 1, 202434000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. This analysis focuses on two prominent players: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Sarepta Therapeutics consistently outpaced Neurocrine Biosciences in cost of revenue, peaking in 2023 with a staggering 150 million, a 60% increase from 2014. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences showed a more modest growth, with its cost of revenue rising by approximately 175% over the same period, reaching nearly 40 million in 2023. This disparity highlights the differing operational scales and strategies of these companies. While Sarepta's higher costs may reflect aggressive expansion and R&D investments, Neurocrine's steadier increase suggests a more conservative approach. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into the financial strategies driving innovation in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025