Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: Booz Allen vs. Curtiss-Wright

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationCurtiss-Wright Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142229642000426301000
Thursday, January 1, 20152159439000411801000
Friday, January 1, 20162319592000383793000
Sunday, January 1, 20172568511000418544000
Monday, January 1, 20182719909000433110000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192932602000422272000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203334378000412825000
Friday, January 1, 20213362722000443096000
Saturday, January 1, 20223633150000445679000
Sunday, January 1, 20234341769000496812000
Monday, January 1, 20241281443000518857000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Corporations

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, understanding spending patterns is crucial. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Corporation, two giants in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Booz Allen Hamilton has seen a significant increase in its Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, growing by approximately 95% from 2014 to 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright Corporation's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of about 17% over the same period, indicating a more conservative approach to cost management. Notably, 2024 data for Curtiss-Wright is missing, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This comparison highlights the strategic differences in managing operational costs and provides valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025