__timestamp | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Curtiss-Wright Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2229642000 | 426301000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2159439000 | 411801000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2319592000 | 383793000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2568511000 | 418544000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2719909000 | 433110000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2932602000 | 422272000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3334378000 | 412825000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3362722000 | 443096000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3633150000 | 445679000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4341769000 | 496812000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1281443000 | 518857000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive landscape of corporate America, understanding spending patterns is crucial. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Corporation, two giants in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Booz Allen Hamilton has seen a significant increase in its Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, growing by approximately 95% from 2014 to 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright Corporation's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of about 17% over the same period, indicating a more conservative approach to cost management. Notably, 2024 data for Curtiss-Wright is missing, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This comparison highlights the strategic differences in managing operational costs and provides valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and American Airlines Group Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation or Allegion plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Corporation: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance