Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Comparative revenue analysis of Taro and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals.

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 201413608000759285000
Thursday, January 1, 201548257000862944000
Friday, January 1, 201626353000950751000
Sunday, January 1, 201725186000879387000
Monday, January 1, 201820653000661913000
Tuesday, January 1, 201948835000669893000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017812000644769000
Friday, January 1, 2021157170000548970000
Saturday, January 1, 2022270827000561347000
Sunday, January 1, 2023331412000572952000
Monday, January 1, 2024629182000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Revenue Trends in Pharmaceuticals: A Comparative Analysis

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding revenue trends is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis focuses on Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., two prominent players in the sector. Over the past decade, Taro has consistently outperformed BioCryst, with revenues peaking at approximately $950 million in 2016. In contrast, BioCryst's revenue growth has been more volatile, with a significant surge in 2023, reaching around $331 million, marking a 20-fold increase from 2014.

Key Insights

  • Taro's Stability: Taro's revenue has shown a steady decline since 2016, yet it remains robust, with 2023 figures at about $573 million.
  • BioCryst's Growth: Despite fluctuations, BioCryst's revenue has grown significantly, particularly from 2021 onwards.

This data highlights the contrasting revenue trajectories of these companies, offering valuable insights for strategic decision-making.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025