Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: GSK plc vs Veracyte, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: GSK's Stability vs Veracyte's Rapid Growth

__timestampGSK plcVeracyte, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014824600000040786000
Thursday, January 1, 2015923200000047876000
Friday, January 1, 2016936600000052035000
Sunday, January 1, 2017967200000055348000
Monday, January 1, 2018991500000065276000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191140200000082720000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201145600000089118000
Friday, January 1, 202110975000000181193000
Saturday, January 1, 20228372000000174078000
Sunday, January 1, 20239385000000184232000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: GSK plc vs Veracyte, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, understanding the financial dynamics of companies is crucial. Over the past decade, GSK plc and Veracyte, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, GSK plc's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking in 2020 with a 39% rise from 2014. In contrast, Veracyte, Inc. has experienced a more dramatic growth, with expenses surging by over 350% during the same period. This stark difference highlights the varying strategic approaches of these companies, with GSK focusing on maintaining a stable growth trajectory, while Veracyte aggressively expands its market presence. As the industry continues to evolve, these financial insights provide a window into the operational strategies and future potential of these key players.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025