__timestamp | Avery Dennison Corporation | Pentair plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1155300000 | 1493800000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1108100000 | 1334300000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1097500000 | 979300000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1123200000 | 1032500000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1127500000 | 534300000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1080400000 | 540100000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1060500000 | 520500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1248500000 | 596400000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1330800000 | 677100000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1177900000 | 680200000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1415300000 | 701400000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. This analysis delves into the SG&A expenses of two industry giants: Pentair plc and Avery Dennison Corporation, from 2014 to 2023.
Over the past decade, Avery Dennison Corporation has consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses compared to Pentair plc, with a peak in 2022, reaching approximately 15% more than its 2014 figures. In contrast, Pentair plc experienced a significant reduction in SG&A expenses, dropping by nearly 55% from 2014 to 2020, before stabilizing in recent years.
These trends reflect strategic shifts within each company. Avery Dennison's steady increase suggests a focus on expansion and innovation, while Pentair's reduction indicates a streamlined approach, possibly due to restructuring or efficiency improvements. Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into each company's operational strategies and market positioning.
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Pentair plc vs Avery Dennison Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pentair plc or ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Pentair plc or AECOM: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pentair plc or Graco Inc.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Pentair plc vs Avery Dennison Corporation