__timestamp | Masco Corporation | RTX Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1607000000 | 6500000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1339000000 | 5886000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1403000000 | 6060000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1442000000 | 6183000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1478000000 | 7066000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1274000000 | 8521000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1292000000 | 5540000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1413000000 | 5224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1390000000 | 5663000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1481000000 | 4029000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1468000000 | 5806000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, RTX Corporation and Masco Corporation have showcased distinct trajectories in their SG&A expenditures. From 2014 to 2023, RTX's SG&A expenses fluctuated significantly, peaking in 2019 and then experiencing a notable decline by 2023. In contrast, Masco's expenses remained relatively stable, with a slight upward trend, culminating in a 2023 figure that was approximately 8% higher than in 2014.
This divergence highlights the strategic differences between the two companies. RTX's volatility may reflect its dynamic business strategies and market conditions, while Masco's steadiness suggests a more consistent operational approach. As we look to 2024, RTX's data remains incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This analysis underscores the importance of SG&A management in corporate strategy and financial health.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down RTX Corporation and Masco Corporation's Expenses
RTX Corporation or TransUnion: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
RTX Corporation vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of RTX Corporation and IDEX Corporation
RTX Corporation vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
RTX Corporation and Masco Corporation: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance