__timestamp | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Snap-on Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 426301000 | 1047900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 411801000 | 1009100000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 383793000 | 1001400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 418544000 | 1101300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 433110000 | 1080700000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 422272000 | 1071500000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 412825000 | 1054800000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 443096000 | 1202300000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 445679000 | 1181200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 496812000 | 1249000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 518857000 | 0 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Snap-on Incorporated and Curtiss-Wright Corporation have demonstrated distinct financial strategies in managing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Snap-on consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.25 billion in 2023, a 25% increase from 2014. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright's expenses grew by about 17% over the same period, reaching nearly $497 million in 2023. This divergence highlights Snap-on's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, potentially fueling its growth. Meanwhile, Curtiss-Wright's more conservative approach may reflect a focus on operational efficiency. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern market, these insights into SG&A trends offer valuable lessons in balancing cost management with strategic growth.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Snap-on Incorporated and Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Snap-on Incorporated and Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Snap-on Incorporated vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Snap-on Incorporated vs Pool Corporation
Snap-on Incorporated and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Snap-on Incorporated vs Clean Harbors, Inc. Trends and Insights
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Snap-on Incorporated vs Nordson Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Snap-on Incorporated and Elbit Systems Ltd.
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Snap-on Incorporated vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Snap-on Incorporated vs Rentokil Initial plc: SG&A Expense Trends