Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Sony Group Corporation vs NetApp, Inc.

Sony vs. NetApp: A Decade of SG&A Strategies

__timestampNetApp, Inc.Sony Group Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201421792000001728520000000
Thursday, January 1, 201521974000001811461000000
Friday, January 1, 201620990000001691930000000
Sunday, January 1, 201719040000001505956000000
Monday, January 1, 201820090000001583197000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919350000001576825000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018480000001502625000000
Friday, January 1, 202120010000001469955000000
Saturday, January 1, 202221360000001588473000000
Sunday, January 1, 202320940000001969170000000
Monday, January 1, 202421360000002156156000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Giants: Sony vs. NetApp in SG&A Expenses

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent corporations: Sony Group Corporation and NetApp, Inc., from 2014 to 2024.

Sony's Strategic Spending

Sony, a titan in the electronics and entertainment sectors, has consistently demonstrated a robust financial strategy. Over the past decade, Sony's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking in 2024 with a 25% rise from 2014. This growth reflects Sony's commitment to innovation and market expansion.

NetApp's Consistent Approach

In contrast, NetApp, a leader in data management solutions, has maintained a more stable SG&A expenditure. Despite minor fluctuations, NetApp's expenses have remained relatively constant, underscoring its focus on operational efficiency.

This comparative analysis highlights the distinct financial strategies of these two industry giants, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025