Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending

R&D Spending: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Sarepta Therapeutics

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanySarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014453400000094231000
Thursday, January 1, 20155920000000146394000
Friday, January 1, 20164940000000188272000
Sunday, January 1, 20176411000000166707000
Monday, January 1, 20186345000000401843000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196148000000560909000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011143000000722343000
Friday, January 1, 202110195000000771182000
Saturday, January 1, 20229509000000877090000
Sunday, January 1, 20239299000000877387000
Monday, January 1, 202411159000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Strategic R&D Investments: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Sarepta Therapeutics

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, research and development (R&D) spending is a critical indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sarepta Therapeutics have demonstrated contrasting strategies in their R&D investments.

A Decade of Growth

From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb consistently increased its R&D spending, peaking in 2020 with a 145% rise from 2014 levels. This strategic focus underscores their dedication to pioneering new treatments and maintaining a competitive edge. In contrast, Sarepta Therapeutics, while smaller in scale, has shown a remarkable 830% increase in R&D expenses over the same period, reflecting its aggressive pursuit of niche markets and innovative therapies.

The Bigger Picture

These trends highlight the diverse approaches within the pharmaceutical industry, where both large-scale and targeted investments can drive significant advancements in healthcare.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025