Broadcom Inc. or Analog Devices, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Broadcom vs. Analog Devices: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Broadcom Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000407000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000486000000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000806000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017691046000799000000
Monday, January 1, 20186959370001056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196480940001709000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206599230001935000000
Friday, January 1, 20219154180001347000000
Saturday, January 1, 202212661750001382000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312735840001592000000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400004959000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Broadcom Inc. or Analog Devices, Inc.?

In the competitive landscape of semiconductor giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Broadcom Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Broadcom's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 291%, peaking in 2024. In contrast, Analog Devices saw a more modest increase of around 180% over the same period. Notably, in 2023, Broadcom's SG&A expenses were about 25% higher than Analog Devices, indicating a more aggressive spending approach.

While Broadcom's strategy might suggest a focus on rapid expansion and market capture, Analog Devices appears to prioritize steady growth and cost efficiency. As the semiconductor industry continues to evolve, these differing approaches highlight the strategic choices companies make to balance growth and cost management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025