Carlisle Companies Incorporated or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Carlisle vs. Jacobs Engineering

__timestampCarlisle Companies IncorporatedJacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143790000001545716000
Thursday, January 1, 20154619000001522811000
Friday, January 1, 20165320000001429233000
Sunday, January 1, 20175894000001379983000
Monday, January 1, 20186254000002180399000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196671000002072177000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206032000002050695000
Friday, January 1, 20216982000002355683000
Saturday, January 1, 20228115000002409190000
Sunday, January 1, 20236252000002398078000
Monday, January 1, 20247228000002140320000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Cost Management: Carlisle vs. Jacobs Engineering

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have been at the forefront of this challenge since 2014. Over the past decade, Jacobs Engineering has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, averaging nearly three times that of Carlisle. However, this isn't necessarily a negative indicator. Jacobs' higher expenses could reflect its larger scale and broader operational scope.

From 2014 to 2023, Carlisle's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 65%, peaking in 2022. In contrast, Jacobs saw a 55% increase, with a notable spike in 2021. Interestingly, 2024 data for Carlisle is missing, leaving room for speculation on its current cost management strategies. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, effective SG&A management remains a key differentiator in sustaining growth and competitiveness.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025