Catalent, Inc. or Novavax, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Catalent vs. Novavax: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampCatalent, Inc.Novavax, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201433480000019928000
Thursday, January 1, 201533730000030842000
Friday, January 1, 201635810000046527000
Sunday, January 1, 201740260000034451000
Monday, January 1, 201846260000034409000
Tuesday, January 1, 201951200000034417000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020577900000145290000
Friday, January 1, 2021687000000298358000
Saturday, January 1, 2022844000000488691000
Sunday, January 1, 2023831000000468946000
Monday, January 1, 2024935000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Catalent vs. Novavax: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Catalent, Inc. and Novavax, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. Catalent's SG&A expenses have steadily increased, peaking at approximately $935 million in 2024, reflecting a strategic expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Novavax's SG&A costs surged dramatically, especially between 2020 and 2022, with a peak of nearly $489 million in 2022, likely driven by the pandemic's demands.

While Catalent's expenses grew by about 179% from 2014 to 2024, Novavax experienced a staggering increase of over 2,300% during the same period. This disparity highlights Catalent's consistent growth strategy versus Novavax's reactive cost management. As the industry continues to evolve, these trends offer valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025