Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Accenture plc vs Teradyne, Inc.

Accenture vs Teradyne: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampAccenture plcTeradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201422190212000769016000
Thursday, January 1, 201523105185000723935000
Friday, January 1, 201624520234000793683000
Sunday, January 1, 201725734986000912734000
Monday, January 1, 201829160515000880408000
Tuesday, January 1, 201929900325000955136000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020303508810001335728000
Friday, January 1, 2021341692610001496225000
Saturday, January 1, 2022418927660001287894000
Sunday, January 1, 2023433801380001139550000
Monday, January 1, 2024437341470001170953000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and consulting, Accenture plc and Teradyne, Inc. stand as titans, each with its unique approach to cost efficiency. Over the past decade, Accenture has demonstrated a remarkable 97% increase in its cost of revenue, reflecting its expansive growth and strategic investments. In contrast, Teradyne, Inc. has shown a more modest 48% rise, indicative of its focused operational strategies.

A Decade of Transformation

From 2014 to 2023, Accenture's cost of revenue surged from approximately $22 billion to over $43 billion, showcasing its aggressive market expansion. Meanwhile, Teradyne's cost of revenue grew from around $769 million to $1.14 billion, highlighting its steady yet impactful presence in the semiconductor industry. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies employed by these industry leaders, with Accenture's broad reach contrasting with Teradyne's specialized focus.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025