Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.

AMD vs. ADI: A Decade of Revenue Efficiency

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Analog Devices, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201436670000001034585000
Thursday, January 1, 201529110000001175830000
Friday, January 1, 201633160000001194236000
Sunday, January 1, 201734660000002045907000
Monday, January 1, 201840280000001967640000
Tuesday, January 1, 201938630000001977315000
Wednesday, January 1, 202054160000001912578000
Friday, January 1, 202185050000002793274000
Saturday, January 1, 2022115500000004481479000
Sunday, January 1, 2023122200000004428321000
Monday, January 1, 2024130600000004045814000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Tech Giants: AMD vs. Analog Devices

In the ever-evolving landscape of semiconductor technology, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) have carved distinct paths. From 2014 to 2023, AMD's cost of revenue surged by over 230%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategy. In contrast, ADI's cost of revenue grew by approximately 330%, showcasing its steady growth and adaptation in the analog technology sector.

Key Insights

  • AMD's Growth Trajectory: By 2023, AMD's cost of revenue reached a peak, highlighting its focus on high-performance computing and graphics solutions.
  • ADI's Consistent Climb: ADI maintained a consistent upward trend, emphasizing its strength in analog and mixed-signal technology.

While AMD's data for 2024 is missing, ADI's continued growth suggests a robust future. This comparison underscores the dynamic nature of the semiconductor industry, where innovation and strategic investments drive success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025