Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Applied Materials, Inc.

AMD vs. Applied Materials: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Applied Materials, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201436670000005229000000
Thursday, January 1, 201529110000005707000000
Friday, January 1, 201633160000006314000000
Sunday, January 1, 201734660000008005000000
Monday, January 1, 201840280000009436000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201938630000008222000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202054160000009510000000
Friday, January 1, 2021850500000012149000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221155000000013792000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231222000000014133000000
Monday, January 1, 20241306000000014279000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: AMD vs. Applied Materials

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Applied Materials, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, AMD's cost of revenue surged by approximately 233%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and increased production capabilities. In contrast, Applied Materials saw a more modest increase of around 170% during the same period, indicating a steady yet controlled expansion.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2017: AMD maintained a relatively stable cost of revenue, while Applied Materials experienced a 53% increase, highlighting its rapid scaling.
  • 2018-2023: Both companies saw significant growth, with AMD's costs peaking at $12.22 billion in 2023, while Applied Materials reached $14.13 billion.

This analysis underscores the dynamic nature of the semiconductor sector, where strategic cost management is pivotal for maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025