Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Analog Devices, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.

Analog Devices vs. VeriSign: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.VeriSign, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141034585000188425000
Thursday, January 1, 20151175830000192788000
Friday, January 1, 20161194236000198242000
Sunday, January 1, 20172045907000193326000
Monday, January 1, 20181967640000192134000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191977315000180467000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201912578000180177000
Friday, January 1, 20212793274000191933000
Saturday, January 1, 20224481479000200700000
Sunday, January 1, 20234428321000197300000
Monday, January 1, 20244045814000191400000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Analog Devices, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Analog Devices saw a staggering 328% increase in their cost of revenue, peaking in 2022. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in cutting-edge technology. In contrast, VeriSign maintained a remarkably stable cost of revenue, with only a 6% fluctuation over the same period, highlighting their focus on operational efficiency.

A Decade of Change

Analog Devices' cost of revenue surged from 2014's $1.03 billion to over $4 billion in 2023, showcasing their growth trajectory. Meanwhile, VeriSign's costs hovered around $190 million, underscoring their steady approach. The missing data for 2024 suggests a potential shift or strategic change. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies companies employ to navigate the competitive tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025