Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: ASML Holding N.V. vs ANSYS, Inc.

ASML vs ANSYS: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampANSYS, Inc.ASML Holding N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141533860003358907000
Thursday, January 1, 20151472460003391700000
Friday, January 1, 20161468600003750300000
Sunday, January 1, 20171501640004976100000
Monday, January 1, 20181558850006225700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191662730006919900000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202252640007181300000
Friday, January 1, 20212579840008802000000
Saturday, January 1, 202225064100010660700000
Sunday, January 1, 202327129800013422400000
Monday, January 1, 202427981900013770900000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, ASML Holding N.V. and ANSYS, Inc. stand as titans in their respective fields. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have demonstrated distinct approaches to managing their cost of revenue. ASML, a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, has seen its cost of revenue soar by nearly 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, ANSYS, a pioneer in engineering simulation software, has maintained a more conservative growth, with a 77% increase in the same period.

This divergence highlights the contrasting business models: ASML's capital-intensive operations versus ANSYS's software-driven approach. As we delve into these figures, it becomes evident that while ASML's costs are higher, they are a testament to its commitment to pushing technological boundaries. Meanwhile, ANSYS's efficiency underscores its focus on sustainable growth and profitability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025