Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: AstraZeneca PLC vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.

AstraZeneca vs. ADMA: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.AstraZeneca PLC
Wednesday, January 1, 201437423675842000000
Thursday, January 1, 201543114614646000000
Friday, January 1, 201663607614126000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017291643214318000000
Monday, January 1, 2018421946354936000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019395042384921000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020612914265299000000
Friday, January 1, 20217976934112437000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211881453512391000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231692730008040000000
Monday, January 1, 202410207000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: AstraZeneca vs. ADMA Biologics

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. This analysis compares the cost of revenue efficiency between AstraZeneca PLC and ADMA Biologics, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, AstraZeneca consistently demonstrated a robust cost management strategy, with its cost of revenue peaking at approximately $12.4 billion in 2021. In contrast, ADMA Biologics, a smaller player, showed a significant upward trend, with its cost of revenue increasing by over 4,400% from 2014 to 2023, reaching around $169 million. This stark contrast highlights AstraZeneca's scale and efficiency, while ADMA's growth trajectory reflects its expanding operations. As the pharmaceutical landscape continues to shift, these insights provide a glimpse into the strategic financial maneuvers of these two companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025