Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: AstraZeneca PLC vs Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

AstraZeneca vs. Halozyme: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014584200000022732000
Thursday, January 1, 2015464600000029245000
Friday, January 1, 2016412600000033206000
Sunday, January 1, 2017431800000031152000
Monday, January 1, 2018493600000010136000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019492100000045546000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020529900000043367000
Friday, January 1, 20211243700000081413000
Saturday, January 1, 202212391000000139304000
Sunday, January 1, 20238040000000192361000
Monday, January 1, 202410207000000159417000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Companies: AstraZeneca vs. Halozyme

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, AstraZeneca PLC and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. AstraZeneca, a global biopharmaceutical giant, has seen its cost of revenue fluctuate, peaking in 2021 with a staggering 124% increase from 2016. In contrast, Halozyme, a smaller biotech firm, has maintained a more modest cost structure, with its highest cost of revenue in 2023 being just 15% of AstraZeneca's 2021 peak.

This comparison highlights the scale and operational differences between large and small pharmaceutical companies. While AstraZeneca's expansive operations lead to higher costs, Halozyme's leaner model allows for more controlled spending. As the industry continues to innovate, understanding these dynamics is crucial for investors and stakeholders alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025