Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Mesoblast Limited

Bausch vs. Mesoblast: A Cost Efficiency Showdown

__timestampBausch Health Companies Inc.Mesoblast Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014225460000025434000
Thursday, January 1, 2015264500000023783000
Friday, January 1, 2016261100000029763000
Sunday, January 1, 2017254800000012065000
Monday, January 1, 201823510000005508000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019235000000075173000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020224900000081497000
Friday, January 1, 2021239400000085731000
Saturday, January 1, 2022236400000063572000
Sunday, January 1, 2023255900000054922000
Monday, January 1, 202441070000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, understanding cost efficiency is paramount. Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Mesoblast Limited, two giants in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Bausch Health consistently maintained a high cost of revenue, averaging around $2.4 billion annually. In stark contrast, Mesoblast Limited's cost of revenue was significantly lower, averaging approximately $45 million per year.

Key Insights

Bausch Health's cost of revenue peaked in 2015, reaching nearly $2.65 billion, while Mesoblast saw its highest cost in 2021 at about $86 million. This disparity highlights the differing scales and operational strategies of these companies. Notably, Bausch Health's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, while Mesoblast experienced more volatility, with a notable dip in 2018. This data underscores the importance of strategic financial management in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025