Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Catalent, Inc.

Cost Efficiency Showdown: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Catalent

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyCatalent, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201439320000001229100000
Thursday, January 1, 201539090000001215500000
Friday, January 1, 201649460000001260500000
Sunday, January 1, 201760660000001420800000
Monday, January 1, 201865470000001710800000
Tuesday, January 1, 201980780000001712900000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020117730000002111000000
Friday, January 1, 202199400000002646000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022101370000003188000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023106930000003216000000
Monday, January 1, 20243428000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Catalent

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Catalent, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb's cost of revenue surged by approximately 172%, peaking in 2020. This increase reflects strategic investments and expansions, particularly in the biologics sector. Meanwhile, Catalent, Inc. exhibited a steady growth of around 162% in the same period, with a notable rise in 2023, indicating its expanding role in drug delivery technologies.

While Bristol-Myers Squibb's cost efficiency fluctuated, Catalent maintained a more consistent upward trend, suggesting a stable operational model. The data for 2024 remains incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As these industry giants continue to innovate, their cost efficiency will remain a key indicator of their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025