Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.

Bristol-Myers vs. Walgreens: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyWalgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014393200000054823000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015390900000076691000000
Friday, January 1, 2016494600000087477000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017606600000089052000000
Monday, January 1, 20186547000000100745000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019807800000091915000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201177300000095905000000
Friday, January 1, 20219940000000104442000000
Saturday, January 1, 202210137000000104437000000
Sunday, January 1, 202310693000000112009000000
Monday, January 1, 202411949000000121134000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical and retail sectors, understanding cost efficiency is paramount. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Walgreens consistently reported a cost of revenue that was approximately 10 times higher than Bristol-Myers Squibb. This disparity highlights the scale and operational differences between a pharmaceutical giant and a retail behemoth.

Bristol-Myers Squibb's cost of revenue grew by about 172% over the decade, peaking in 2020, while Walgreens saw a steadier increase of around 104%, reaching its zenith in 2023. The data for 2024 is incomplete, but the trend suggests Walgreens' continued dominance in revenue expenditure. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies and market dynamics at play in these two sectors, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025