Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Biotech Cost Efficiency: Gilead vs. ADMA

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201437423673788000000
Thursday, January 1, 201543114614006000000
Friday, January 1, 201663607614261000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017291643214371000000
Monday, January 1, 2018421946354853000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019395042384675000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020612914264572000000
Friday, January 1, 2021797693416601000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221188145355657000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231692730006498000000
Monday, January 1, 202428675800000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the ever-evolving world of biotechnology, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. This chart compares the cost of revenue for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Gilead Sciences consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $6.6 billion in 2021. In contrast, ADMA Biologics, a smaller player, saw its cost of revenue grow significantly, increasing by over 4,400% from 2014 to 2023. This stark difference highlights the scale and operational dynamics between a biotech giant and a growing company. While Gilead's costs reflect its expansive operations, ADMA's rising costs indicate its aggressive growth strategy. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into the financial health and strategic priorities of these companies, offering a glimpse into the competitive landscape of the biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025