Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited

Gilead vs. Teva: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201437880000009216000000
Thursday, January 1, 201540060000008296000000
Friday, January 1, 2016426100000010044000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017437100000011560000000
Monday, January 1, 2018485300000010558000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201946750000009351000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202045720000008933000000
Friday, January 1, 202166010000008284000000
Saturday, January 1, 202256570000007952000000
Sunday, January 1, 202364980000008200000000
Monday, January 1, 2024286758000008480000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: Gilead vs. Teva

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited have demonstrated contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead's cost of revenue increased by approximately 72%, peaking in 2021. This upward trend reflects Gilead's strategic investments in research and development, which have been pivotal in maintaining its competitive edge.

Conversely, Teva's cost of revenue has shown a more volatile pattern, with a notable 31% decrease from its 2017 peak. This reduction aligns with Teva's restructuring efforts and cost-cutting measures aimed at improving profitability. By 2023, Teva's cost efficiency had stabilized, indicating a successful adaptation to market challenges.

These insights underscore the dynamic nature of the pharmaceutical sector, where strategic financial management is key to sustaining growth and innovation.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025