Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: GSK plc vs Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.

GSK vs Dyne: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampDyne Therapeutics, Inc.GSK plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201411450000007323000000
Thursday, January 1, 201520280000008853000000
Friday, January 1, 201622810000009290000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017293200000010342000000
Monday, January 1, 20182400010241000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201927100011863000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202070000011704000000
Friday, January 1, 2021108800011603000000
Saturday, January 1, 202233450009554000000
Sunday, January 1, 202324610008565000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. GSK plc, a stalwart in the industry, and Dyne Therapeutics, Inc., a rising star, offer a fascinating comparison. From 2014 to 2023, GSK consistently maintained a high cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $11.9 billion in 2019. In contrast, Dyne Therapeutics experienced significant fluctuations, with a notable dip in 2018, where costs plummeted to just $24,000. This stark difference highlights GSK's stable yet high expenditure, while Dyne's variable costs suggest a more dynamic approach. Over the decade, GSK's cost of revenue decreased by about 28%, while Dyne's saw a dramatic 99% drop from its 2017 peak. This data not only underscores the contrasting strategies of these companies but also reflects broader industry trends in cost management and efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025