Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Intel Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.

Intel vs. Pure Storage: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampIntel CorporationPure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142026100000024129000
Thursday, January 1, 20152067600000077552000
Friday, January 1, 201623196000000167893000
Sunday, January 1, 201723692000000252279000
Monday, January 1, 201827111000000353781000
Tuesday, January 1, 201929825000000457528000
Wednesday, January 1, 202034255000000509886000
Friday, January 1, 202135209000000535255000
Saturday, January 1, 202236188000000708329000
Sunday, January 1, 202332517000000855788000
Monday, January 1, 202435756000000809430000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: Intel vs. Pure Storage

In the ever-evolving tech industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Intel Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. Intel, a stalwart in the semiconductor industry, has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 60% from 2014 to 2023, peaking in 2022. This reflects its expansive operations and market dominance. In contrast, Pure Storage, a relatively newer player, has experienced a staggering increase of over 3,400% in the same period, highlighting its rapid growth and scaling efforts. While Intel's cost efficiency reflects stability, Pure Storage's figures underscore its aggressive expansion strategy. Notably, 2024 data for Intel is missing, indicating potential shifts or reporting delays. As these companies navigate the future, their cost management strategies will be pivotal in maintaining competitive edges.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025