Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Grifols, S.A.

Cost Efficiency: Grifols vs. Intra-Cellular Therapies

__timestampGrifols, S.A.Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014165617000021226345
Thursday, January 1, 20152003565000139626
Friday, January 1, 2016213753900093831530
Sunday, January 1, 2017216606200079419009
Monday, January 1, 20182437164000368673
Tuesday, January 1, 20192757459000477121
Wednesday, January 1, 202030848730001895029
Friday, January 1, 202129705220008034589
Saturday, January 1, 2022383243700020443000
Sunday, January 1, 2023426927600033745000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. This analysis compares the cost of revenue efficiency between Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and Grifols, S.A. from 2014 to 2023. Grifols, a global leader in plasma-derived medicines, consistently shows a robust cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $4.3 billion in 2023. In contrast, Intra-Cellular Therapies, a biopharmaceutical company focused on central nervous system disorders, demonstrates a more modest trajectory, with costs rising to around $33.7 million in the same year.

Grifols' cost of revenue increased by about 158% over the decade, reflecting its expansive operations and market reach. Meanwhile, Intra-Cellular Therapies saw a significant rise of over 1,500%, albeit from a much smaller base, indicating rapid growth and investment in its niche sector. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies and scales of operation within the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025