Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Lockheed Martin Corporation vs Masco Corporation

Lockheed vs Masco: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampLockheed Martin CorporationMasco Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014402260000006134000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015408300000004889000000
Friday, January 1, 2016421060000004901000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017455000000005033000000
Monday, January 1, 2018463920000005670000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019514450000004336000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020567440000004601000000
Friday, January 1, 2021579830000005512000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022576970000005967000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023590920000005131000000
Monday, January 1, 2024641130000004997000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of American industry, Lockheed Martin Corporation and Masco Corporation stand as titans in their respective fields. From 2014 to 2023, Lockheed Martin's cost of revenue has shown a robust upward trend, increasing by approximately 60%, reflecting its strategic investments and operational efficiencies. In contrast, Masco Corporation, a leader in home improvement and building products, has maintained a more stable cost of revenue, with fluctuations around the $5 billion mark.

Lockheed Martin's cost of revenue efficiency highlights its ability to scale operations while managing costs effectively, a testament to its dominance in the aerospace and defense sector. Meanwhile, Masco's steadiness suggests a focus on maintaining cost control amidst market volatility. The data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This comparison offers a fascinating glimpse into how two industry leaders manage their financial strategies over a decade.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025