Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Novo Nordisk A/S vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Cost Efficiency: Novo Nordisk vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Novo Nordisk A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 201412200014562000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015189600016188000000
Friday, January 1, 2016269900017183000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017170200017632000000
Monday, January 1, 201847100017617000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019410100020088000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020167600020932000000
Friday, January 1, 2021726400023658000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022659400028448000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023466100035765000000
Monday, January 1, 202444522000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the world of pharmaceuticals, cost efficiency is a critical factor for success. This chart provides a fascinating comparison between Novo Nordisk A/S and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., two companies with distinct financial trajectories from 2014 to 2023.

Novo Nordisk, a global leader in diabetes care, consistently demonstrates robust cost management. Over the past decade, their cost of revenue has grown from approximately $14.6 billion in 2014 to $35.8 billion in 2023, reflecting a steady increase in operational scale. Despite this growth, their efficiency remains impressive, with costs rising at a controlled pace.

In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, a smaller biotech firm, shows a more volatile pattern. Starting with a modest $122,000 in 2014, their costs peaked at $7.3 million in 2021, before settling at $4.7 million in 2023. This fluctuation highlights the challenges smaller firms face in maintaining cost efficiency while scaling operations.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025