Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Novo Nordisk A/S vs Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited

Cost Efficiency Showdown: Novo Nordisk vs. Takeda

__timestampNovo Nordisk A/STakeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201414562000000520990000000
Thursday, January 1, 201516188000000535405000000
Friday, January 1, 201617183000000558755000000
Sunday, January 1, 201717632000000495921000000
Monday, January 1, 201817617000000659690000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019200880000001089764000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020932000000994308000000
Friday, January 1, 2021236580000001106846000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022284480000001244072000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023357650000001431505000000
Monday, January 1, 2024445220000001431505000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Giants: Novo Nordisk vs. Takeda

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. This chart provides a fascinating comparison of the cost of revenue between two industry titans: Novo Nordisk A/S and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, from 2014 to 2023.

Novo Nordisk, renowned for its diabetes care products, has shown a steady increase in cost efficiency, with a 145% rise in cost of revenue over the decade. In contrast, Takeda, a leader in oncology and gastroenterology, has experienced a more dramatic 175% increase, reflecting its expansive growth strategy.

Interestingly, while Takeda's cost of revenue is significantly higher, the trend suggests a more aggressive market expansion. The data for 2024 is incomplete, indicating potential shifts in strategy or market conditions. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches these companies take in navigating the complex pharmaceutical landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025