Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Pfizer Inc. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Biopharma Cost Efficiency: Pfizer vs. ADMA

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Pfizer Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201437423679577000000
Thursday, January 1, 201543114619648000000
Friday, January 1, 2016636076112329000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172916432111240000000
Monday, January 1, 20184219463511248000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193950423810219000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020612914268692000000
Friday, January 1, 20217976934130821000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211881453534344000000
Sunday, January 1, 202316927300029687000000
Monday, January 1, 202417851000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of biopharmaceuticals, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Pfizer's cost of revenue surged by approximately 210%, peaking in 2022. This reflects its expansive operations and significant market presence. In contrast, ADMA Biologics, a smaller player, experienced a staggering 4,400% increase, highlighting its rapid growth phase.

Key Insights

  • Pfizer Inc.: Despite fluctuations, Pfizer maintained a robust cost efficiency, with a notable spike in 2021, aligning with its COVID-19 vaccine production.
  • ADMA Biologics, Inc.: The company's cost of revenue grew exponentially, indicating aggressive expansion and scaling efforts.

This comparison underscores the diverse strategies and growth patterns within the biopharma sector, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025