Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: SAP SE vs International Business Machines Corporation

SAP vs IBM: A Decade of Cost Efficiency Trends

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationSAP SE
Wednesday, January 1, 2014463860000005272000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015410570000006626000000
Friday, January 1, 2016414030000006570000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017421960000007051000000
Monday, January 1, 2018426550000007462000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019261810000008351000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020243140000007886000000
Friday, January 1, 2021258650000007946000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022278420000008936000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023275600000008604000000
Monday, January 1, 2024272020000009164000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: SAP SE vs IBM

In the ever-evolving landscape of global technology giants, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Over the past decade, SAP SE and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) have showcased contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, IBM's cost of revenue has seen a significant decline of approximately 41%, dropping from 46.4 billion to 27.6 billion. This reduction reflects IBM's strategic shift towards more efficient operations and possibly a focus on higher-margin services.

Conversely, SAP SE has experienced a steady increase in its cost of revenue, rising by about 63% from 5.3 billion to 8.6 billion over the same period. This growth may indicate SAP's expansion efforts and increased investment in its cloud services. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial reporting. As these industry leaders continue to adapt, their cost efficiency strategies will remain pivotal in shaping their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025