Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: SAP SE vs Pure Storage, Inc.

SAP vs Pure Storage: A Cost Efficiency Showdown

__timestampPure Storage, Inc.SAP SE
Wednesday, January 1, 2014241290005272000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015775520006626000000
Friday, January 1, 20161678930006570000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172522790007051000000
Monday, January 1, 20183537810007462000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194575280008351000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205098860007886000000
Friday, January 1, 20215352550007946000000
Saturday, January 1, 20227083290008936000000
Sunday, January 1, 20238557880008604000000
Monday, January 1, 20248094300009164000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. SAP SE, a stalwart in enterprise software, and Pure Storage, Inc., a rising star in data storage, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, SAP SE consistently maintained a high cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $8.9 billion in 2022. In contrast, Pure Storage, Inc. demonstrated rapid growth, with its cost of revenue surging from a modest $24 million in 2014 to an impressive $856 million by 2023, marking a staggering 3,458% increase.

While SAP SE's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, Pure Storage's exponential rise reflects its aggressive market expansion. However, 2024 data for SAP SE is missing, leaving room for speculation. This comparison underscores the dynamic nature of tech industry economics, where established giants and agile newcomers navigate the complex terrain of cost efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025