Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: TransUnion vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

TransUnion vs. Booz Allen: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationTransUnion
Wednesday, January 1, 20142716113000499100000
Thursday, January 1, 20152593849000531600000
Friday, January 1, 20162580026000579100000
Sunday, January 1, 20172691982000645700000
Monday, January 1, 20182867103000790100000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193100466000874100000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203379180000920400000
Friday, January 1, 20213657530000991600000
Saturday, January 1, 202238996220001222900000
Sunday, January 1, 202343048100001517300000
Monday, January 1, 202482028470000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis

TransUnion vs. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of financial efficiency, understanding cost of revenue is crucial. This metric, which reflects the direct costs attributable to the production of goods sold by a company, offers insights into operational efficiency. From 2014 to 2023, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation consistently outperformed TransUnion in terms of cost of revenue efficiency. Booz Allen's cost of revenue increased by approximately 58% over this period, peaking at $8.2 billion in 2024, while TransUnion's costs rose by about 204%, reaching $1.5 billion in 2023. This stark contrast highlights Booz Allen's robust operational strategies, despite the missing data for 2024. As businesses navigate the complexities of financial management, these insights underscore the importance of strategic cost management in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025